Thursday, February 27, 2020

Intercultural film analysis Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Intercultural film analysis - Assignment Example In disappointment, Akeem leaves for America to look for a woman who â€Å"arouses my intellect as well as my loins.† The other part of the film is about the sojourn and the task of finding a suitable wife in a culturally different land. The use of verbal communication to shape individual perceptions and ultimately cultural views is notably portrayed in the film. For instance, Daryl, Akeem’s romantic rival, at one point disapproves of the prince’s African upbringing saying, â€Å"Wearing clothes must be a new experience for you.† (Wikipedia, 2013). In so saying, Daryl confirms what many Americans think of Africans. In the film, Akeem speaks fluent English thus defying the notion that foreigners can be recognized by how they speak. Further, the fact that he speaks with remarkably standard grammar and enunciation says a lot about the African American English as not being an African language. Akeem’s personality portrays the cultural distance between the United States and Africa without allowing for the expression of that distance as a contrast between the advanced West and the poor Africa. The film does not depict any language barriers resulting from the interplay of the interaction of cultures. In fact, all the characters in the film are portrayed as speaking the same language and communication is effective. However, despite this ‘standardization’ of language, the film is not free of stereotyping as shown in the treatment Akeem get from Daryl. Furthermore, the fact that Daryl is American makes him feel that his thoughts and ideas are much better than Akeem’s, who pretends to be a poor foreign student while in America. The use of language is particularly important as evidenced in the manner in which Akeem and his aide make new friends and acquire jobs at McDowell’s. The fact that Akeem could speak the American language did not necessarily incorporate him

Tuesday, February 11, 2020

Philo 115 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Philo 115 - Essay Example been playing dirty power politics in the White House, the man in the conversations responds by derogatorily attacking the Clintons and he says that the Clintons are Arkansas ad for that reason they are next to the Orkies. Question 3. The correct fallacy for this snippet is the fallacy of begging the question. This is because the conclusion that, weeks of patient investigation had revealed that gas leaked at Bhopal India with thousands of investigation is already presumed in the premise that something went wrong. (a) Small Sample fallacy: Paul Stiglich committed this fallacy by claiming that there was a necessary connection between the ceremony performed by the Red Indian and the heavy rain that fell shortly after the performance. This is because Stiglich did not have enough samples to make that conclusion; Stiglich’s conclusion is based on small sample ( one sample only). (b) Hasty Conclusion: Paul Stiglich committed this fallacy by drawing a general conclusion from a particular single case. By claiming that the Red Indian’s performance had a connection and actually caused the heavy rain that fell after the Indian’s performance, Stiglich made a hasty generalization because he did not have sufficient evidence to make such a general claim. (c) The Fallacy of Supressed Evidence : By claiming that the performance of the Red Indian cause the heavy rain that fell shortly after the Red-Indian’s performance, Paul Stiglich overlooking, suppressed, and omitting other important evidence on what causes the rain. This is because there is sufficient scientific evidence on what causes rain and how rain comes about. Stiglich omitted such evidence in making his conclusion that the Red Indian’s performance caused the rain. (d) The Fallacy of Superstition: Paul Stiglich’s claim that the Red-Indian’s performance cause the heavy rain that fell after the performance is clearly a superstitious claim. This is because there is no scientific proof that such a